tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3486144322043340030.post1059779687183974180..comments2023-08-14T10:27:13.006-04:00Comments on Security - The Global Perspective: Ubuntu Bashing ContinuedJJChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08102466843919236000noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3486144322043340030.post-34473644990004111832008-01-05T19:09:00.000-05:002008-01-05T19:09:00.000-05:00$ ifconfig -andis0: flags=8843 UP,BROADCAST,RUNNIN...$ ifconfig -a<BR/>ndis0: flags=8843 UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500<BR/> inet 192.168.1.8 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255<BR/> ether 00:14:a5:77:e6:ef<BR/> media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (OFDM/54Mbps)<BR/> status: associated<BR/> ssid "fsck you" channel 4 bssid 00:18:01:e7:d6:c7<BR/> authmode WPA privacy OFF txpowmax 100 bmiss 7 protmode CTSJJChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08102466843919236000noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3486144322043340030.post-72655447717884077452008-01-04T17:10:00.000-05:002008-01-04T17:10:00.000-05:00Keep in mind that it's an NDIS wrapper that I used...Keep in mind that it's an NDIS wrapper that I used, but it certainly outperforms the Ubuntu *trash wireless support*. In the past the wireless was a bit of a pain (it's still not as pretty as Ubuntu)...but I'll take performance over shininess any day of the week!<BR/><BR/>If you have any questions or issues getting your BSD up and running let me know and I'll write a tutorial if need be :-)<BR/><BR/>Cheers,<BR/>JJCJJChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08102466843919236000noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3486144322043340030.post-82405114168488192982008-01-02T19:04:00.000-05:002008-01-02T19:04:00.000-05:00I'm surprised to hear that BSD offers better wirel...I'm surprised to hear that BSD offers better wireless performance than Ubuntu. <BR/><BR/>Wireless in Ubuntu is definitely one of the most irritating things I've dealt with in the Linux world.<BR/><BR/>I've been itching to try BSD. Perhaps now is the time.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com